Author Archive for The Unreasonablemen

A grand vision…

This isn’t my normal topic, but I can’t resist. I’ve secretly always harbored a dream that NZ might really make something of itself. Do what Germany & Japan did post WWII & Ireland have done recently & recreate their economies. To me, the easiest way to do this was to remove our dependency on the outside world for products. My reasoning? It just seems quite similar to any addiction, at some stage, if you are going to get ahead you have to break the habit.

So I was quite enamoured by the NZ herald article that states

that New Zealand was one of just a handful of places identified worldwide that was well placed to become carbon-neutral for transport, given advances in biofuel technology…..New Zealand could be a world leader in the field and was already getting international attention because it could be self-sufficient given the ratio of vehicles to land available.

Fantastic, love the grand vision, why not!…Then I thought about it, and then I found some problems with this approach.

  1. we need a government who has the long term interests of the nation at heart, not the next re-election, this is after all a 40 year plan!!
  2. If we are the only country that can do this doesn’t that mean other more powerful / innovative countries will solve the oil / transportation issue in their own way & we end up with an orphan technology? (Cuba anyone?)
  3. 25 yrs @ $ 2-3 billion a year…. To be honest if we couldn’t invent something better technically, sooner and with a better NPV return and that didn’t rely on combustion to create energy with $100 -150 billion then we should be shot.

I do applaud the vision though is sincerely hope that one little nation can, & will be a leader in alternate energies for our planets sake as well as for our economy.

So, if we were serious about this kind of nationwide transformation, and we had loads of cash, what do you folks think NZ could do? What is your grand vision?

This one’s straight from the “what the..” category

From computerworld this morning

Telecom chief executive Paul Reynolds has joined the board of XConnect Global Networks, which provides VoIP and IP-based services

From the Xconnect website

XConnect’s award winning services enable over 400 VoIP service providers and carriers worldwide to peer with millions of VoIP endpoints.

Am I alone in thinking that this is way up the bizarre scale? Telecom’s stance around fast broad band, VoIP Trunking and even VoIP solutions has been to treat it like something distasteful stuck to the bottom of your shoe, and their new CEO does this????

Disclosure - Diversity Limited is a consultant to Telecom New Zealand and its subsidiaries.

Microsoft’s picture of a unified future…

{this is a mirror post of unreasonablemen.net}

And no it has nothing to do with Vista….

[youtube]http://youtube.com/watch?v=MbGMN5hTe5w[/youtube]

BUT, it does have everything to do with Microsoft Mesh and MS’s S+S strategy. Gianpaolo from the development team outlines a simple S+S example here.

I love Office 2007, the interface is clean, efficient and now very familiar. Far, far, far superior to any web based productivity tools I tested. The problem of course was collaboration and anywhere access. How do I share documents with others and/or how do I access my docs from anywhere. Now I use Office Live workspaces in conjunction to Office. The combination of the two is very appealing:

I use Office (Word, Excel, Powerpoint) locally to author a document, presentation or spreadsheet and Office Live workspace in the cloud to collaborate with others and as an anywhere access store.

MS’s view of interconnectedness between offline and online worlds, (on premise and cloud computing) requires some sort of synchronisation. This framework is essential for them to retain their incumbent desktop business while paying homage to the growing movement toward SaaS & into cloud computing.

Couple this with some IP based unified communications elements and you get all the functions depicted in the future piece. I’ve watched that video twice, and possibly like many of you found it to be a little surreal. But have a long think about the elements to achieve that.

Ubiquitous networks, unified communications (yip MS is into Telco, more in this bit), shared workspaces, cloud based storage and fileshare. Not that futuristic really…

Is the collaboration war just Google v Microsoft?

This is a mirror post of my own blog unreasonablemen.net

Pop quiz.

Who is the second largest software company in the world?

Who is the second largest provider of on-premise email & collaboration software?

 

The answer to both is IBM. The interesting thing about IBM is that they have been virtually anonymous on the SaaS front. Up until now that is.

 I recently attended a seminar co-hosted by IBM & Saugatuck on SaaS. For the most part this was a bit of a disappointment (I’ll describe the IBM play in more detail below). The most interesting thing was the declaration of IBM’s own SaaS plans code named ‘bluehouse’. Interestingly this isn’t top secret, IBM has told the world all about it, it just hasn’t been picked up.

 

Collaboration services delivered on the Web
“Bluehouse” is the code name for a future software as a service offering from IBM designed for companies with five to 500 employees. “Bluehouse” extends the value of the Lotus Foundations family by providing extranet collaboration services for open social networking, instant messaging, file sharing, project management and web conferencing.

The suite outlined by IBM is very comprehensive, much more impressive than MS’s somewhat disappointing announcement of last week & includes email, unified Comms, document shaving, social network applications, video collaboration & a bit more.

Various aspects of blue house are very interesting. Firstly in a SaaS world the barriers that notes has in getting into an entrenched MS go away. Secondly brand value means that to many corporates this is a credible alternative Thirdly IBM hasn’t really got a lot to loose. This article (which is 3 yrs old) claims notes had 23% market share (which just feels way too high). The point is IBM is loosing the email race. But now with SaaS they could tank the price of email etc & get back in the game in fairly short order. Fascinating play that should definite spice up the email wars.

As an interesting aside. Go to the Software top 100 site & type in Google…. What does that tell you???

 

More on the IBM SaaS model.

 IBM appear to have done the math & realised that SaaS is actually quite threatening to their core hardware & software business. The rationale? In a SaaS world the ISV builds their ‘stack’ only once & will likely never move. That is the buying decision for H/W & S/W is centralised & baked in. So vendors like themselves miss out on all the business on-prem software drive & if they don’t get the ISV on their platforms ( DB2 , websphere , hardware etc) at initiation there’s no way back in.

So IBM’s play is to get to the SaaS vendors at start-up. Kinda boring but pretty real I guess.

 

 

Share the love...